20.4. Perspectives on Science Seminar: Faik Kurtulmus

Dear All,

In our next week’s Perspectives on Science Seminar, Faik Kurtulmus (Sabancı University) will give a talk titled “Justice in the Distribution of Knowledge” on his joint work with Gürol Irzik.

The seminar will take place online on Zoom and in Metsätalo room 10 from 14:15 to 15:45 on Monday, April 20, 2026. The speaker will be joining us online.

Perspectives on Science is a research seminar that brings together experts from the philosophy of science and several fields of science studies. It is organized by TINT – Centre for Philosophy of Social Science at the University of Helsinki. More information about the seminar can be found on the TINT webpage https://tint.helsinki.fi.

What: “Justice in the Distribution of Knowledge” by Faik Kurtulmus

When: Monday, 20.04.2026, from 2 to 4 pm (EEST, Helsinki time).

Where: Zoom and Metsätalo room 10. The speaker is only present via Zoom.

Zoom link: Contact mirja-leena.zgurskaya@helsinki.fi for the Zoom link.

Abstract:

“Justice in the Distribution of Knowledge” by Faik Kurtulmus (joint work with Gürol Irzik)

Knowledge plays a vital role in promoting human flourishing, democratic citizenship, and in enabling societies to pursue justice. The opportunity to acquire much of this knowledge depends on the joint operation of institutions such as the news media, science, and education—what we call the epistemic basic structure of society. When coupled with the widely shared commitment to political equality and equal opportunity to flourish, these truths carry an overlooked but profound implication: societies must be assessed not only by how they distribute income, rights, and opportunities, but also by how well and fairly their epistemic basic structure serves citizens’ and society’s knowledge needs.

In our forthcoming book Justice in the Distribution of Knowledge (OUP 2026), Gürol Irzik and I develop an account of distributive epistemic justice centered on two requirements. First, a just epistemic basic structure must provide citizens with a fair opportunity to acquire the knowledge they need to deliberate about their individual good, the common good, and how to pursue them. Second, it must produce and disseminate the knowledge that citizens and public officials need to comply with the demands of justice. The book defends these requirements and explores their implications for science, journalism and education. 

My talk will present an overview of the book focusing particularly on the implications of our account for science. 

Bio:

Faik Kurtulmus is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Sabancı University, Istanbul. His work lies at the intersection of political philosophy, social epistemology and philosophy of science.

____

If you have any questions about the seminar, do not hesitate to contact mirja-leena.zgurskaya@helsinki.fi.

30.3. Perspectives on Science Seminar: Panu Raatikainen

Dear All,

In our next week’s Perspectives on Science Seminar, Panu Raatikainen (University of Tampere) will give a talk titled “Consciousness, Materialism, and Explanation”.

The seminar will take place in Metsätalo room 10, and online on Zoom from 14:15 to 15:45 on Monday, March 30, 2026.

Perspectives on Science is a research seminar that brings together experts from the philosophy of science and several fields of science studies. It is organized by TINT – Centre for Philosophy of Social Science at the University of Helsinki. More information about the seminar can be found on the TINT webpage https://tint.helsinki.fi.

What: “Consciousness, Materialism, and Explanation” by Panu Raatikainen

When: Monday 30.03.2026, from 2 to 4 pm (EEST, Helsinki time).

Where: Metsätalo room 10 and Zoom. 

Zoom link: Contact mirja-leena.zgurskaya@helsinki.fi for the Zoom link.

Abstract:

“Consciousness, Materialism, and Explanation”

In recent decades, phenomenal consciousness has been a central topic in philosophy. It is often regarded as a challenge to materialism. David Chalmers, for instance, has famously used it in his attempt to refute materialism in favor of a form of property dualism. Following his lead, it has become customary to speak of “the hard problem of consciousness.” Chalmers’s arguments are frequently presented in conjunction with his sophisticated and controversial two‑dimensional semantic framework. However, beneath this technical apparatus lies a more fundamental line of thought that is arguably independent of such technicalities. In particular, both Type‑A materialists and Chalmers (and others of similar persuasion) share the following background assumption (where “physical” means strictly physical, i.e., expressible in the language of microphysics):

(SA) If a certain higher‑level fact supervenes on narrowly physical facts with metaphysical necessity, then that higher‑level fact can, in principle, be deduced a priori from the subvening physical facts.

Moreover, even many Type‑B materialists—who reject (SA)—nevertheless agree with the following:

(BI) If some higher‑level facts, or the bridge laws connecting them to more fundamental facts, cannot be deduced a priori from those more fundamental facts (here: microphysical facts), then they are “brute facts” and “inexplicable.”

These assumptions have dominated recent debates about consciousness. In this talk, I contrast them with an alternative perspective informed by contemporary philosophy of science. I argue that the above theses rely on a strong, somewhat outdated, and problematic conception of explanation and reduction. I also evaluate them at a more concrete level through selected examples from, for instance, the philosophy of chemistry and mechanistic explanations in the biological sciences. I conclude with some remarks on the status of materialism as a working hypothesis.

Bio:

Panu Raatikainen is a Professor of Philosophy and the Head of the Field of Study at Tampere University, Finland. He received his doctorate in Theoretical Philosophy from the University of Helsinki in 1998. Raatikainen has worked as an Academy Research Fellow of the Academy of Finland and as a Fellow at the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. He has also been a visiting research fellow at the Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London; at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY); and an Affiliated Research Scholar with the Saul Kripke Center at the CUNY Graduate Center.
His academic work has ranged from logic, computability, and the philosophy of science to the philosophy of language and mind. Raatikainen’s research output exceeds one hundred publications in journals such as AnalysisErkenntnisSyntheseEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science, and Journal of Symbolic Logic. His current research interests include natural kinds and “the hard problem of consciousness.” 

____

If you have any questions about the seminar, do not hesitate to contact mirja-leena.zgurskaya@helsinki.fi.

Impact and outreach 2019

2019

Raul Hakli, Samuli Reijula, Arto Laitinen & Petri Ylikoski
Tekoälyn filosofiaa [Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence]
Participation in a panel on the philosophy of AI, organized by SFY, University of Helsinki Cognitive Science and Intelligenzia.

Jaakko Kuorikoski
Interview on the philosophy of economics. Francesco Guala interviewed prominent scholars who work at the intersection between the two disciplines, discussing hot topics.

Caterina Marchionni
Interview in the SCI-PHI podcast about philosophy and methodology of economics. 18.6.2019.

Arto Laitinen
Hallitus haluaa tekoälylle eettiset ohjeet – Tamperelaisprofessori kertoo, millaisia ongelmia niillä ratkaistaan, Aamulehti 5.6.2019.
Interview on the Finnish government’s plans for ethical guidelines for AI.

Michiru Nagatsu
Will architecture save the environment or ruin it?
Panelist in discussion at World Village festival, 26.5.2019.

Sonja Amadae
A chapter, “Kansallismielisten populistien haaste keskustaoikeistolle ja kolme kysymystä Euroopan liberaaleille” [The national populists’ challenge to the center-right and three questions for the liberals of Europe], written together with Henri Aaltonen in the popular science bookVapiseva Eurooppa — Mitä seuraa eurooppalaisen politiikan kaaoksesta? [Quivering Europe – what comes of the European political chaos?].

Säde Hormio
Ilmastonmuutos ja tiedeskeptisyyden taustavoimat. [Climate change and the forces behind science skepticism] Philosophical Society of Finland 24.4.2019.
Discussion on science skepticism.

Säde Hormio
Ympäristöahdistus on totta. [Climate anxiety is real] Yle Akuutti 10.4.2019.
Expert interview on Finnish national television.

Arto Laitinen
Onko tekoäly palvonnan kohde, orja vai kumppani? [Is AI a target of worship, a slave or a companion?] Alusta! verkkolehti 3/2019.
Participation in a podcast discussion on Alusta! e-publication of Tampere University.

Samuli Reijula & Jaakko Kuorikoski with Jaakko Lehtinen
Tekoäly – uusi ATK? [AI – The new ADP?]
Discussion in the open seminar Tekoäly, ihminen ja yhteiskunta [AI, Human and Society], Tampere University 17-18.1.2019.

Uskali Mäki
Tieteeltä leikkaaminen ei ole säästämistä. [Defunding science is not saving] Hämeen sanomat 12.1.2019.
Opinion piece in a Finnish newspaper.