Publications – Centre for Philosophy of Social Science

For items published before the year 2015, please see the publications archive.
For another view on TINT publications, see the Helsinki University research portal, as well as the list of research projects

Forthcoming

Kaidesoja, Tuukka. Forthcoming. Schematic Narrative Templates in National Remembering. Memory Studies.

Koskinen, Inkeri. Forthcoming. We Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science. Social Epistemology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2286253

Marchionni, Caterina, Julie Zahle and Marion Godman. Reactivity in the human sciences. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00571-y

Marchionni, Caterina. Forthcoming. Challenging the mechanistic view of integration in psychiatry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/724977

Mäkelä, Pekka & Walsh, Adrian: We-thinking as the motivational driver for socially responsible behaviour. In Lorenzo Sacconi and Giacomo Degli Antoni (eds.), Handbook on the economics of social responsibility: individuals, corporations and institutions.

Rolin, Kristina: Philosophy of science: Analytic feminist approaches. In Kim Q. Hall and Ásta Sveinsdóttir (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Philosophy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ylikoski, Petri: Making sense of the norm of self-interest. In M. Erola (ed.), Norms, Moral and Social structures.

Ylikoski, Petri: Thinking with the Coleman Boat. In F. Stadler, S. Pihlström & N. Weidtmann (eds.), Philosophy of Social Science, Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook. Springer.

2024

Hormio, Säde (2024). Taking Responsibility for Climate Change. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hormio, Säde and Samuli Reijula (2024). Universities as anarchic knowledge institutions, Social Epistemology, 38(2), 119–134. [Open access]

Lari, Teemu (2024). The problems of macroeconomics as institutional problems: complementing the ‘what went wrong’ story with a social epistemology perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, beae012. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beae012

Lari, Teemu (2024). What counts as relevant criticism? Longino’s critical contextual empiricism and the feminist criticism of mainstream economics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 104, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.02.005

Raerinne, Jani (2024): Popperian Ecology is a Delusion. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11106

Ronzani, P. & Panizza, F. & Morisseau, T. & Mattavelli, S. & Martini, C. (2024). How different incentives reduce scientific misinformation online. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/how-different-incentives-reduce-scientific-misinformation-online/

Sarkia, Matti (2024) Mechanistic Explanation, Interdisciplinary Integration and Interpersonal Social Coordination. Social Epistemology. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02691728.2023.2294841

Salmela, M. Vienni Baptista, B. & Cheas, K. (2024). Tieteidenväliset ja transtieteiset tutkijat: tieteen rikkaruohoja vai sen queerejä edelläkävijöitä? Tiedepolitiikka 1/2024, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.58957/tp.132011

Seppälä, Päivi and Magdalena Małecka (forthcoming). AI and discriminative decisions in recruitment: Challenging the core assumptions, Big Data & Society, 11 (1): 1-12. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20539517241235872

Thomson, O. P., & Martini, C. (2024). Pseudoscience – A skeleton in osteopathy’s closet? International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 100716. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000099

2023

Eigi-Watkin, Jaana & Koskinen, Inkeri (2023). Reasoning by analogy and the transdisciplinarian’s circle: on the problem of knowledge transfer across cases in transdisciplinary research. Sustainability Science 18, 1343–1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01315-2

Grüne-Yanoff, Till, Caterina Marchionni, and Tatu Nuotio (2023). The relevance of mechanisms and mechanistic knowledge for behavioural interventions: the case of household energy consumption. Economics & Philosophy,1-20.

Hormio, Säde (2023). Collective responsibility for climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.830

Koskinen Inkeri (2023). Societal Impact in Research Collaborations beyond the Boundaries of Science. Perspectives on Science 2023; 31 (6): 744–770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00593

Koskinen, Inkeri (2023). Participation and Objectivity. Philosophy of Science 90(2), 413-432. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.77

Kuorikoski, Jaakko, and Caterina Marchionni. (2023) Evidential Variety and Mixed-Methods Research in Social Science. Philosophy of Science 90.5: 1449-1458.

Lehtinen, A. & Raerinne, J. (2023): Simulated Data in Empirical Science. Foundations of Science. 10.1007/s10699-023-09934-9

Marchionni, Caterina, and Päivi Oinas. The multiple-theories problem: The case of spatial industrial clustering. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 55.1: 46-62.

Panizza, F. & Ronzani, P. & Morisseau, T. & Mattavelli, S. & and Martini, C. (2023) How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking? Humanities and Social Science Communication 10, 867. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02329-y

Raerinne, J. (2023): Myths of Past Biases and Progress in Biology. Theory in Biosciences 142: 383-399.

Reijula, Samuli and Ralph Hertwig (2023). Self-nudging and the citizen choice architect. In Sunstein & Reisch (eds.) Research Handbook on Nudges and Society, 263-291. [Open access] (Originally published 2022 in Behavioral Public Policy)

Rolin, Kristina, Inkeri Koskinen, Jaakko Kuorikoski and Samuli Reijula (2023). Social and cognitive diversity in science: introduction , Synthese 202:36. [Open access]

Sarkia, Matti (2023) A Model-Based and Mechanistic Approach to Social Coordination. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 16(1).

Sarkia, Matti & Tuukka Kaidesoja (2023) Two Approaches to Naturalistic Social Ontology. Synthese 201:104. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-023-04105-6

Välikangas, Anita (2023). The poor position of the social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary funding and its effects. Social epistemology 38(2): 152-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2245769

2022

Amadae, S.M. & Watts, Christopher J. (2022): Red Queen and Red King Effects in cultural agent-based modeling: Hawk Dove Binary and Systemic Discrimination. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2021.2012668

Godman, Marion, and Caterina Marchionni. What should scientists do about (harmful) interactive effects?. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12.4 (2022): 63.

Hormio, Säde (2022). Group Lies and the Narrative Constraint. Episteme (First View) https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.12

Kaidesoja, Tuukka (2022). A theoretical framework for explaining the paradox of university rankings. Social Science Information. DOI:10.1177/05390184221079470

Kaidesoja, Tuukka, Mikko Hyyryläinen & Ronny Puustinen (2022). “Two traditions of cognitive sociology: An analysis and assessment of their cognitive and methodological assumptions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12341

Koskinen, Inkeri (2022). How institutional solutions meant to increase diversity in science fail. Synthese 200, 483. DOI:http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21378/

Koskinen, Inkeri (2022). Reactivity as a tool in emancipatory activist research. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12, 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-022-00487-5

Koskinen, Inkeri & Rolin, Kristina. (2022). Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91, 191-198.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko, and Caterina Marchionni. (2022) Mixed Method Research and Variety of Evidence in Political Science. Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Political Science.

Salice, A. & Salmela, M. (2022), What are emotional mechanisms?, Emotions and society, vol. 4, no. 1, 49-68 . https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16369909628542

Välikangas, Anita (2022). The uses of grand challenges in research policy and university management: something for everyone. Journal of Responsible Innovation 9(1): 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2040870

2021

Kaidesoja, Tuukka. 2021. “Three Concepts of Causal Mechanism in the Social Sciences“. In J. Erola, P. Naumanen, H. Kettunen & V-M. Paasivaara (eds.). Norms, Moral and and Policy Changes: Essays in honor of Hannu Ruonavaara. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. pp.81-101.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka, Mikko Hyyryläinen, Ronny Puustinen & Matti Sarkia (2021): Kognitiivinen sosiologia kulttuurin ja toiminnan suhteen tutkimuksessa. Sosiologia. 58:4, pp. 381-397.

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2021. “Objectivity in contexts: withholding epistemic judgement as a strategy for mitigating collective bias“. Synthese 199, 211–225.

Koskinen, Inkeri and Ludwig, David. 2021. “Philosophy or Philosophies? Epistemology or Epistemologies?” In Ludwig, D., Koskinen, I., Mncube, Z., Poliseli, L. and Reyes-Galindo, L. (eds.), Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. Routledge, 15–25.

Koskinen, Inkeri and Rolin, Kristina. 2021. “Structural epistemic (in) justice in global contexts“. In Ludwig, D., Koskinen, I., Mncube, Z., Poliseli, L. and Reyes-Galindo, L. (eds.), Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science. Routledge, 115–125.

Lari, Teemu (2021). “When does complementarity support pluralism about schools of economic thought?” Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(3), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1945659

Ludwig, David, Koskinen, Inkeri, Mncube, Zinhle, Poliseli, Luana, and Reyes-Galindo, Luis (eds.). 2021. “Global Epistemologies and Philosophies of Science“. Routledge.

Amadae, S.M.: “Life as Algorithm“. In Jenny Andersson & Sarah Kemp (Eds.): Futures: Twenty-First Century Approaches to Literature. Oxford University Press.

Lehtinen, Aki: “The Helsinki approach to economic methodology, or, how to espouse the mainstream?“. [SI by John Davis and Wade Hands (Eds.)]. Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(1), pp. 79-87

Małecka, Magdalena: “Knowledge, behaviour, and policy: questioning the epistemic presuppositions of applying behavioural science in public policymaking“. Synthese, 1/2021

Kuorikoski, Jaakko: “There Are No Mathematical Explanations“. Philosophy of Science (PSA 2020/2021) DOI: 10.1086/711479

Marchionni, Caterina. Social Aspects of Economics Modelling: Disciplinary Norms and Performativity. Methodology and History of Economics. Routledge, 2022. 37-52.

Mäki, Uskali: “The field: tasks, pasts, futures“. [SI by John Davis and Wade Hands (Eds.)], Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(1), pp. 3-13

Mäki, Uskali: “Homo Economicus under multiple pressures“. In S. Egashira, M. Taishiro, W. Hands, U. Mäki (Eds.): A Geneaology of Self-Interest in Economics. Springer. pp. 309-325. [Download PDF]

Małecka, Magdalena: “Values in economics: a recent revival with a twist“. [SI by John Davis and Wade Hands (Eds.)]. Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(1), pp. 88-97 DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868776

Nagatsu, Michiru: “Co-production and economics: insights from the constructive use of experimental games in adaptive resource management“. [SI by John Davis and Wade Hands (Eds.)], Journal of Economic Methodology 28(1), pp. 134-142

Pozzoni, Gianluca & Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Context in Mechanism-Based Explanation“. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, pp. 1-32.

Reijula, Samuli and Kuorikoski, Jaakko: “The diversity-ability trade-off in scientific problem solving“. Philosophy of Science (PSA 2020/2021)

2020

Aydinonat, N. E., Reijula, S., & Ylikoski, P. K.: “Argumentative landscapes: the function of models in social epistemology“. Synthese. 10.1007/s11229-020-02661-9

Elliott-Graves, Alkistis: “The Value of Imprecise Predictions“. Philosophy, theory, and practice in biology, 12(4), pp. 1-19.

Favereau, Judith & Nagatsu, Michiru: “Holding Back From Theory: Limits and Methodological Alternatives of Randomized Field Experiments in Development Economics“. Journal of Economic Methodology, pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2020.1717585

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2020. “Defending a risk account of scientific objectivity“. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71:4, 1187–1207.

Małecka, Magdalena: “The normative decision theory in economics: A philosophy of science perspective. The case of the expected utility theory“. Journal of Economic Methodology, 27(1), pp. 36-50. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1640891

Marchionni, Caterina, and Jack Vromen. Neuroeconomics as a case of mechanistic integration. Social Neuroeconomics. Routledge, 2020. 13-30.

Mäki, Uskali: “Puzzled by idealizations and understanding their functions“. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50 (3), pp. 215-237. SAGE Publications. [Download .pdf]

Mäki, Uskali: “Notes on economics imperialism and norms of scientific inquiry“. Revue de philosophie Économique, 21, pp. 95-127. [Download .pdf]

Nagatsu, M., Davis, T., DesRoches, C. T., Koskinen, I., MacLeod, M., Stojanovic, M., and Thorén, H. 2020. “Philosophy of Science for Sustainability Science“. Sustainability Science 15, 1807–1817.

Nagatsu, Michiru & Favereau, Judith: “Two Strands of Field Experiments in Economics: A Historical-Methodological Analysis“. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(1), pp. 45-77. DOI: 10.1177/0048393119890393

Raerinne, Jani: “Generalization in Evo-Devo“. In Laura Nuno de la Rosa, & Gerd Müller (Eds.): Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_92-1

Rolin, Kristina: “Trust in science“. In Simon Judith (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge.

Salmela, Mikko: “Les émotions peuvent-elles être collectives?” Translated into French by Laurence Kaufmann. A special issue in Raisons pratiques, edited by Louis Quï¿½rï¿½ and Laurence Kaufmann.

Sarkia, Matti, Kaidesoja, Tuukka & Hyyryläinen, Mikko: “Mechanistic explanations in the cognitive social sciences: lessons from three case studies“. Social Science Information, 59(4), pp. 580-603.

2019

Amadae, S.M.: “Computable Rationality, NUTS, and the Nuclear Leviathan“. In D. Bessner, & N. Guilhot (eds.), The Decisionist Imagination: Democracy, Sovereignty and Social Science in the 20th Century. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 173-216.

Amadae, S.M. & Shahar, Avin: “Autonomy and Machine Learning as Risk Factors at the Interface of Nuclear Weapons, Computers and People“. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk: Euro-Atlantic Perspectives, SIPRI, May 2019, pp. 105-118.

Aydinonat, N. Emrah: “The Puzzle of Idealization“. Metascience, 28, pp. 257â€“260.

Aydinonat, N. Emrah & Kï¿½ksal, Emin: “Explanatory Value in Context: The Curious Case of Hotelling’s Location Model“. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26 (5), pp. 879-910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2019.1626460

Hakli, Raul & Mäkelä, Pekka: “Moral Responsibility of Robots and Hybrid Agents”. The Monist, 102 (2) (1 April 2019), pp. 259-275.

Jukola, Saana: “Commercial interests, agenda setting, and the epistemic trustworthiness of nutrition guidelines“. Synthese, April 2019, pp. 1ï¿½18. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02228-3

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Building middle-range theories from case studies“. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 78, pp. 23-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.11.008

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Mittarien reaktiivisuus ja objektiivisuus yliopistojen yhteismitallistamisessa“. Tiedepolitiikka, 2/2019, pp. 7-18.

Kaidesoja, T., Sarkia, M. & Hyyryläinen, M.: “Arguments for the cognitive social sciences“. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 49 (4), pp. 480-498. DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12226

Koskinen, Inkeri and Rolin, Kristina. 2019. “Scientific/intellectual movements remedying epistemic injustice: The case of Indigenous studies“. Philosophy of Science 86:5, 1052–1063.

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2019. “Relativism in the Philosophy of Anthropology“. In Kusch, M. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism. London and New York: Routledge, 425–434.

Małecka, Magdalena & Lepenies, Robert: “Behaviour change: extralegal, apolitical, scientistic?” In Beck S. & Strassheim H. (eds.), Handbook of Behaviour Change. Edward Elgar, pp. 344-359. DOI: 10.4337/9781785367854.00032

Małecka, Magdalena & Lepenies, Robert: “The ethics of behavioural public policy“. In Poama A. & Lever A. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Ethics and Public Policy. Routledge, pp. 513-525.

Małecka, Magdalena & Nagatsu, Michiru: “The many faces of the behavioural research that informed consumer law. A historical overview“. In Micklitz H., Sibony A.-L. and F. Esposito (eds.), Handbook of research methods in consumer law. Edward Elgar.

Małecka, Magdalena & Cserne, Pï¿½ter (eds.): Law and Economics as Interdisciplinary Exchange. Philosophical, Methodological and Historical Perspectives. Routledge.

Marchionni, Caterina & Reijula, Samuli: “What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Volume 73, pp. 54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.08.003

Mäki, U., MacLeod, M., Merz, M., & Nagatsu, M.: “Investigating Interdisciplinary Practice: Methodological Challenges (Introduction)“. [Special issue]. Perspectives on Science: Philosophical, Historical, Sociological, 27 (4), pp. 545-552. DOI: 10.1162/posc_e_00315

Nagatsu, Michiru: “Applying Experimental Philosophy to Investigate Economic Concepts: Choice, Preference, and Nudge“. In D. Wilkenfeld, & R. Samuels (eds.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Science. Bloomsbury, pp. 147-171. DOI: 10.5040/9781350068896

Nagatsu, Michiru & Ruzzene, Attilia (eds.): Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury.

Nagatsu, Michiru & Pï¿½der, Kaire: “What is the economic concept of choice? An experimental philosophy study“. Economics & Philosophy, pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.1017/S0266267118000500

Reijula, Samuli & Kuorikoski, Jaakko: “Modeling epistemic communities“. In Fricker, M., Graham, P.J., Henderson, D., Pedersen, N. & Wyatt, J. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology, pp. 240-249.

Rolin, Kristina: “The epistemic significance of diversity“. In Miranda Fricker, Peter J. Graham, David Henderson, Nikolaj Pedersen, and Jeremy Wyatt (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 158-166. DOI: 10.4324/9781315717937

Salmela, Mikko: “Can Emotions Be Collective?” In Andrea Scarantino (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotion Theory. New York and London: Routledge.

Salmela, Mikko: “Collective emotions and normativity“. Protosociology, Volume 35, pp. 135-151. DOI: 10.5840/protosociology2018358

Salmela, Mikko: “Shame and its political consequences in the age of Neoliberalism“. In C. Mun (ed.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Shame: Theory, Method, Norms, Cultures, and Politics. New York: Lexington Books.

Vromen Jack, & Marchionni Caterina (eds.): Routledge Major Works: Neuroeconomics. Routledge.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Versioning and Structural Change“. In Nagatsu, M. & Ruzzene, A. (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy and Social Science: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue. London: Bloomsbury.

Zahle, Julie & Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Emergence in the Social Sciences“. In S. C. Gibb., R. F. Hendry & T. Lancaster (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emergence. pp. 124-134. Routledge.

2018

Amadae, S.M.: “Economics Imperialism Reconsidered“. In Mäki, Uskali, Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela & Walsh, Adrian (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge, pp. 140-160.

Amadae, S.M.: “Game theory, cheap talk and post‐truth politics: David Lewis vs. John Searle on reasons for truth‐telling“. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 48 (3), pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12169

Amadae, S.M.: “The Dogma of Computability: Neoliberal Capitalism, Neo-Materialism, and Beyond“. Springerin, 1. https://www.springerin.at/en/2018/1/dogma-der-berechenbarkeit/

Aydinonat, N. Emrah: “The Diversity of Models as a Means to Better Explanations in Economics“. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25 (3), pp. 237-251. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2018.1488478

Aydinonat, N. Emrah: “Philosophy of Economics Rules: introduction to the symposium“. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25 (3), pp. 211-217. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2018.1503143

Aydinonat, N. Emrah & P. Ylikoski: “Three conceptions of the theory of institutions“. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 48 (6), pp. 550-568. DOI: 10.1177/0048393118798619

Elliott-Graves, Alkistis: “Generality and Causal Interdependence in Ecology“. Philosophy of Science, 85 (5), pp. 1102-1114. DOI: 10.1086/699698

Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela: “Imperializing Epistemology: Shortcomings of the Naturalistic Turn in Philosophy of Science“. In Mäki, Uskali, Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela & Walsh, Adrian (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge, pp. 274-290.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till & Marchionni, Caterina: “Modeling model selection in model pluralism“. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25 (3), pp. 265-275. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2018.1488572

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, T., Marchionni, C., & Feufel, M.: “Toward a framework for selecting behavioural policies: how to choose between boosts and nudges“. Economics and Philosophy, 34 (2), pp. 243-266. DOI: 10.1017/S0266267118000032

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “A Dynamic and Multifunctional Account of Middle-Range Theories“. British Journal of Sociology (Wylie Online Library).

Kaidesoja, Tuukka & Ilkka Kauppinen: “Akateeminen kapitalismi nykyisessä tiedepolitiikassa“. Tiede & Edistys, 43 (2), pp. 95-123.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka, Kankainen, Tomi & Ylikoski, Petri (eds.): Syistä selityksiin: Kausaalisuus ja selittäminen yhteiskuntatieteissä. Gaudeamus: Helsinki.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Sosiaalisilla mekanismeilla selittäminen historiallisessa sosiologiassa“. In T. Kaidesoja, T. Kankainen & P. Ylikoski (eds.), Syistä selityksiin: Kausaalisuus ja selittäminen yhteiskuntatieteissä. Gaudeamus: Helsinki.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka & Ylikoski, Petri: “Johdanto“. In T. Kaidesoja, T. Kankainen & P. Ylikoski (eds.), Syistä selityksiin: Kausaalisuus ja selittäminen yhteiskuntatieteissä. Gaudeamus: Helsinki.

Koskinen, Inkeri: “Voiko se olla objektiivista? Tieteenulkoinen tieto ja yhteistyï¿½ soveltavassa kulttuurintutkimuksessa“. [Can it be objective? Extra-academic knowledge and collaboration in applied cultural research]. In P. Hï¿½meenaho, T. Suopajärvi and J. Ylipulli (eds.), Soveltava kulttuurintutkimus [Applied cultural research]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

Lehtinen, Aki: “Derivational robustness and indirect confirmation“. (e-pub ahead of print) Erkenntnis, 83 (3), pp. 539-576. DOI: 10.1007/s10670-017-9902-6

MacLeod, Miles: “Scientific Subordination, Molecular Biology and Systems Biology“. In Mäki, Uskali, Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela & Walsh, Adrian (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge, pp. 187-204.

MacLeod, M., & Nagatsu, M: “What does interdisciplinarity look like in practice: Mapping interdisciplinarity and its limits in the environmental sciences“. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 67 (February 2018), pp. 74-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.01.001

Małecka, Magdalena: “Economics imperialism in law & economics“. In Marciano A. & Ramello G.B. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_741-1

Małecka, Magdalena & Lepenies, Robert: “Is the behavioural approach a form of scientific imperialism? An analysis of law and policy“. In Mäki, Uskali, Fernández Pinto, Manuela & Walsh, Adrian (eds.), Scientific imperialism: exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity, Routledge, pp. 254-273.

Marchionni, Caterina: “What is the problem with model-based explanation in economics?“, Disputatio, 47 (9), pp. 603-630. DOI: 10.1515/disp-2017-0020

Mireles-Flores, Luis: “Recent trends in economic methodology: a literature review“. In L. Fiorito, S. Scheall & C. E. Suprinyak (eds.), Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology (ISSN 0743-4154), Volume 36A, pp. 93-126. Emerald Publishing.

Mäkelä, P. A. & Hakli, R. A.: “Bad Arguments for Responsibility Sharing“. In Coeckelbergh, M., Loh, J., Funk, M., Seibt, J. & Nï¿½rskov, M. (eds.), Envisioning Robots in Society – Power, Politics, and Public Space: Proceedings of Robophilosophy / TRANSOR 2018. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 311, pp. 275-282. Amsterdam: IOS PRESS.

Mäkelä, P., Hakli, R. A. & Amadae, S. M.: “Understanding Institutions without Collective Acceptance?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 48 (6), pp. 608-629. DOI: 10.1177/0048393118799078

Mäki, U. “Rights and wrongs of economic modelling: Refining Rodrik. “. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25 (3), pp. 218-236. DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2018.1488475 [Download .pdf]

Mäki, Uskali, Fernández Pinto, Manuela, & Walsh, Adrian (eds): Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity, Routledge

Raerinne, Jani: “Abstraction in Ecology: Reductionism and Holism as Complementary Heuristics“. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 8 (3), pp. 395ï¿½416. DOI: 10.1007/s13194-017-0191-3

Rolin, Kristina: “Scientific imperialism and epistemic injustice“. In U. Mï¿½ki, M. Fernï¿½ndez Pinto & A. Walsh (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge, pp. 51-68.

Salmela, Mikko & Mï¿½ki, Uskali: “Disciplinary Emotions in Imperialistic Interdisciplinarity“. In Mï¿½ki, Uskali, Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela & Walsh, Adrian (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge, pp. 31-50.

Zahle, J.: “Values and Data Collection in Social Research“. Philosophy of Science, 85 (1), pp. 144-163. DOI: 10.1086/694770

2017

Amadae, S.M.: “Neoliberalismo e governmentalita“. Aut Aut, vol. 376. Dec. 2017, 35-48.

Amadae, S.M.: “Perpetual Anarchy: From economic security to financial insecurity“. Finance and Society, 3, pp. 188-196. [Download PDF]

Basso, Alessandra: “The appeal to robustness in measurement practice“. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 65-66 (October-December 2017), pp. 57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.02.001 (E-pub ahead of print)

Basso, Alexandra, Lisciandra, Chiara & Marchionni, Caterina: “Hypothetical models in social science: their features and uses“. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer, pp. 413-433.

Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela: “Agnotology and the New Politicization of Science and Scientization of Politics“. The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science (ISBN 978-1138922983), Routledge, pp. 341-350.

Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela: “To Know or Better Not to: Agnotology and the Social Construction of Ignorance in Commercially Driven Research“. Science & Technology Studies (ISSN 2243-4690), 30 (2), pp. 53-72.

Gronow, Antti & Tuukka Kaidesoja (eds.): Ihmismielen sosiaalisuus. Gaudeamus.

Gronow, Antti & Tuukka Kaidesoja: “Johdanto: Erï¿½ï¿½n ultrasosiaalisen kï¿½dellisen mieli. ” In A. Gronow & T. Kaidesoja (eds.), Ihmismielen sosiaalisuus. Gaudeamus.

Hands, Wade: “Conundrums of the Representative Agent“. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41 (6), pp. 1685ï¿½1704, DOI: 10.1093/cje/bex016 (E-pub ahead of print.)

Hakli, Raul: “Cooperative human-robot planning with team reasoning“. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9 (5), pp. 643-658. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-016-0377-4

Hakli, Raul, & Mï¿½kelï¿½, Pekka. “Planning in the we-mode“. In Preyer, G. & Peter, G. (eds.), Critical Essays on the Philosophy of Raimo Tuomela with His Responses, Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality, Springer, pp. 117-140.

Hakli, Raul & Seibt, Johanna (eds.): “Sociality and Normativity for Robots: Philosophical Inquiries into Human-Robot Interactions“. Springer Series on Philosophy of Sociality, pp. 1-10.

Hertwig, R. & Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, T.: “Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions“. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 (6), pp. 973-986. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617702496

Hormio, Säde: “Can Corporations Have (Moral) Responsibility Regarding Climate Change Mitigation?” Ethics, Policy & Environment, 20 (3), 314ï¿½332. DOI: 10.1080/21550085.2017.1374015

Hormio, Säde: “Climate Change Mitigation, Sustainability and Non-substitutability“. In A. Walsh, S. Hormio, & D. Purves (eds.), The Ethical Underpinnings of Climate Economics, Routledge, London, pp. 103-121.

Jukola, Saana: “A social epistemological inquiry into biases in journal peer review“. Perspectives on Science, 25 (1), pp. 124-148. DOI: 10.1162/POSC_a_00237

Jukola, Saana: “On ideals of objectivity, judgment, and bias in medical research ï¿½ A comment on Stegenga“. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, 62 (April 2017), pp. 35-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.02.001

Jukola, Saana: “Tieteen objektiivisuuden ehdoista.” Ajatus. Tampere: Juvenes Print, pp. 289ï¿½298.

Jukola, Saana: “New directions in philosophy of medicine“. In Marcum, J. (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Philosophy of Medicine. Together with Stegenga, J., Kennedy, A.,Tekin, S. & Bluhm, R., pp. 343–367.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Causal Inference and Modeling“. In L. MacIntyre & A. Rosenberg (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Routledge: London.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Reclaiming Naturalized Critical Realism: A Response to McWherther“. Journal of Critical Realism, 16 (2), pp. 200-222. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2016.1255100

Kaidesoja, Tuukka & Paavola, Sami: “Ympï¿½ristï¿½ï¿½n hajautunut kognitio“, In A. Gronow & T. Kaidesoja (eds.), Ihmismielen sosiaalisuus. Gaudeamus.

Kincaid, Harold: “DSM Applications to Young Children: Are There Really Bipolar and Depressed Two Year Olds?” In S. Tekin & J. Poland (eds.), Extraordinary Science: Responding to the Crisis in Psychiatric Research. MIT Press.

Kincaid, Harold: “Reductionism in the Social Sciences“. In L. McIntyre & A. Rosenberg (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Routledge: London.

Kincaid, Harold: “Unrealistic Models, Mechanisms, and the Social Sciences“. In Hannes Leitgeb, Ilkka Niiniluoto, Pï¿½ivi Seppï¿½lï¿½ & Elliott Sober (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science ï¿½ Proceedings of the 15th International Congress. College Publications.

Kincaid, Harold: “Classificatory Challenges in Psychiatric Classification “. In M. Solomon, J. Simon, & H. Kincaid (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Medicine.ï¿½pp. 170-180.ï¿½

Koskinen, Inkeri. 2017. “Where is the epistemic community? On democratisation of science and social accounts of objectivity“. Synthese 194:12, 4671–4686.

Knuuttila, Tarja & Loettgers, Andrea: “Mathematization in Synthetic Biology: Analogies, Templates, and Fictions“. In Lenhard, J. & Carrier, M. (eds.), Mathematics as Tool. Springer, pp. 37-53. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54469-4_3

Koi, P., Uusitalo, S. & Tuominen, J.: “Self-Control in Responsibility Enhancement and Criminal Rehabilitation“. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 12 (2), pp. 227ï¿½244. DOI: 10.1007/s11572-017-9423-z

Koskinen, Inkeri: “Not-So-Well-Designed Scientific Communities“. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. 6 (10), pp. 54ï¿½58.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko: “The Empirical Counter-Revolution“. In McIntyre, L. & Rosenberg, A. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Routledge, pp. 88-98.

Laitinen, Arto: “Dewey’s Progressive Historicism and the Problem of Determinate Oughts“. Special issue on Dewey’s Ethical and Critical Theory, Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 31 (2), pp. 245-259. DOI: 10.5325/jspecphil.31.2.0245

Lisciandra, Chiara: “Robustness Analysis and Tractability in Modeling“. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 7 (1), pp. 79-95. DOI: 10.1007/s13194-016-0146-0

MacLeod, Miles & Nersessian, Nancy J: “Models and Simulations“. In Magnani L. & Bertolotti T. (eds.), Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer, pp. 119-132.

Mäki, Uskali: “Modelling Failure“. In Ilkka Niiniluoto, Pï¿½ivi Seppï¿½lï¿½ & Elliott Sober (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science – Proceedings of the 15th International Congress. College Publications, UK. [Download PDF]

Malecka, Magdalena: “Kelsen vs. Posner. The challenges for scientific analysis of law“. European Journal of Law and Economics. 43 (3), pp. 495ï¿½516.

Marchionni, Caterina: “Mechanisms in economics“. In Stuart Glennan & Phyllis Illari (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. Routledge, pp. 423-434.

Nagatsu, M., Larsen, K., Karabegovic, M.,Szï¿½kely, M., Mï¿½nster, D. & Michael, J.: “Making good cider out of bad apples: Signaling expectations boosts cooperation among would-be free riders“. Judgment and Decision Making. 13 (1), pp. 137-149.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “Aaltofunktio ja mahdollisuus kvanttimekaniikassa” (Translated from Finnish: The wave function and possibility in quantum mechanics). In I. Niiniluoto, T. Tahko, & T. Toppinen (eds.), Mahdollisuus [Possibility]. Helsinki: The Philosophical Society of Finland. pp. 103-111.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “Is there room in quantum ontology for a genuine causal role of consciousness?” In A. Khrennikov, & Emmanuel Haven (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Quantum Models in Social Science: Applications and Grand Challenges . London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 293-317.

Pï¿½yhï¿½nen, Samuli: “Value of cognitive diversity in science“.ï¿½Synthese, 194 (11), pp. 4519ï¿½4540. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1147-4

Raerinne, Jani: “Explanations of Exceptions in Biology: Corrective Asymmetry vs. Autonomy“. Synthese. 194 (12), pp. 5073ï¿½5092. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-016-1195-9

Reijula, Samuli: “How could a rational analysis model explain?” COGSCI 2017.

Rolin, Kristina: “Scientific community: A moral dimension“. Social Epistemology. 31 (5), pp. 468-483. DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2017.1346722

Rolin, Kristina: “Can social diversity be best incorporated into science by adopting the social value management ideal?“. In Daniel Steel & Kevin C. Elliott (eds.), Current Controversies in Values and Science. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 113-129.

Rolin, Kristina: “More new essays on epistemic agency. Review of Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency: Decentralizing Epistemic Agency“. In Patrick Reider (ed.), Metascience. 26 (3), pp. 463-466. DOI: 10.1007/s11016-017-0222-x

Rolin, Kristina: “Scientific dissent and a fair distribution of epistemic responsibility“. Public Affairs Quarterly. 31 (3), pp. 209-230.

Rusanen, A.-M. & Ylikoski, P.: “Algoritmit, tekoï¿½ly ï¿½ tieteen murros?” Futura, 2/2017, pp. 15-24.

Salmela, Mikko & Nagatsu, Michiru: “How Does It Really Feel To Act Together? Shared Emotions And The Phenomenology Of We-agency“. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16 (3), pp. 449ï¿½470. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-016-9465-z

Salmela, Mikko & von Scheve, Christian: “Emotional Roots of Right-Wing Political Populism“. Social Science Information. 56 (4), pp. 567-595. DOI: 10.1177/0539018417734419

Walsh, Adrian & Boucher, Sandy: “Scientific Imperialism, Folk Morality and the Proper Boundaries of Disciplines“. In Mï¿½ki, Uskali, Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela & Walsh, Adrian (eds.), Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge

Solomon, M., J. Simon & H. Kincaid (eds.): Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Medicine. Routledge: London.ï¿½

Tuomela, Raimo: “Responses to the Critics of Raimo Tuomela’s “Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents” (OUP, 2013)”. In Preyer, G. & Peter, G. (eds.), Critical Essays on the Philosophy of Raimo Tuomela with His Responses. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality. Springer

Uusitalo, Susanne: “On the Wrongness of Exploitation and the Voluntariness of Consent in Clinical Research on Opioid Assisted Treatment“. The American Journal of Bioethics. 17 (12), pp. 44ï¿½45.

Uusitalo, Susanne: “Review of Vulnerability, Autonomy, and Applied Ethics by Christine Straehle (Ed.), Routledge, 2016“. Metapsychology online reviews, Volume 21, Issue 39.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Methodological Individualism“. In Lee McIntyre & Alexander Rosenberg (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Routledge, pp. 135-146.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Moral Gods and Origins of Human Cooperation” In Pessi, Luomanen & Pyysiäinen (eds.), Christianity and the Roots of Morality, Leiden: Brill.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Social Mechanisms“. In S. Glennan & P. Illari (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy. Routledge, pp. 401-412.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Mielen haaste“. In Gronow & Kaidesoja (eds.), Ihmismielen sosiaalisuus. Gaudeamus

Ylikoski, Petri: “Explanation“. In Bryan S. Turner (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Social Simulation“. In Bryan S. Turner (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Zahle, Julie: “Ability Theories of Practice and Turner’s Criticism of Bourdieu“. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 48 (4), pp. 553ï¿½567. DOI: 10.1007/s10838-016-9355-7

Zahle, Julie: “Emergence“. In Lee McIntyre & Alexander Rosenberg (eds.), Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science. Routledge Publishers.

Zahle, Julie: ï¿½Privacy, Informed Consent, and Participant Observationï¿½. Perspectives on Science. 25 (4), pp. 465-487. DOI: 10.1162/POSC_a_00250

2016

Amadae, S.M.: “The Computability of Rational Action“. In What Robots Can and Should Do, Proceedings of Robo-Philosophy.

Amadae, S.M.: “Dialectical Libertarianism: The Unintended Consequences of Both Ethics and Incentives Underlie Mutual Prosperity“. A review essay on Deidre McCloskey’s Bourgeois Equality, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics. 9 (2), pp. 37-52.

Amadae, S.M.: Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy. Cambridge University Press. 350 pp.

Aydinonat, Emrah: “ILO/TEPAV Contractual arrangements in Turkey’s coal mines: forms, extents, drivers, legal drivers and impact on OSH“. International Labour Organization, ILO Office for Turkey. Ankara: ILO. https://goo.gl/S3qNCe

Bertolaso, M. & MacLeod, M.: “Introduction – In Silico Modeling: the Human Factor“. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 30, pp. 1-5.

Claveau, François & Luis Mireles-Flores: “Causal generalisations in policy-oriented economic research: an inferentialist analysis“. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 30 (4), pp. 383-398. DOI: 10.1080/02698595.2017.1331976

Malene F. Damholdt, Martin H. Olesen, Marco Nï¿½rskov, Raul Hakli, Stefan Larsen, Christina Vestergaard & Johanna Seibt: “A generic scale for assessment of attitudes towards social robots: The ASOR-5“. In Seibt, J., Nï¿½rskov, M. & Schack Andersen, S. (eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do, Proceedings of Robophilosophy/TRANSOR 2016, IOS Press: Amsterdam, pp. 45-47.

Eloranta. S. Hakli, R., Niinivaara O. & Nykänen, M.: “How to deal with unbelievable assertions”. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 78 (3-4), pp. 323-360. Online version available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10472-015-9493-3

Favereau, Judith: “Expérimentations. Expériences randomisées en économie du développement et économie des conventions” In Philippe Batifoullier et al. (eds.), Dictionnaire des conventions. Villeneuve d’Asq: Presse Universitaire du Septentrion.

Faverau, Judith: “On the analogy between Field Experiments in Economics and Clinical Trials in Medicine”. Journal of Economic Methodology, June 2016.

Fernï¿½ndez Pinto, Manuela: “Economics Imperialism in Social Epistemology: A Critical Assessment”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences . 46 (5), pp. 443-472. (ISSN 0048-3931)

Godman, Marion: “Cultural Syndromes: Socially Learned but Real“. Filosofia Unisinos, 17 (2), pp. 185-191.

Godman, Marion: “Mï¿½jliga Trï¿½skindividers Omï¿½jliga Medlemskap“. In I. Niiniluoto, T. Tahko, & T. Toppinen (Eds.), Mahdollisuus/Mï¿½jlighet, Helsingfors: Filosofiska Fï¿½reningen i Finland, 87ï¿½93. (Trans. from Swedish: “Possible swamp individuals, impossible membership”, in Possibility, Helsinki: Philosophical Society in Finland). ISBN-13 978 951-9264-84-4

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “Framing”. In: Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn and Sven Ove Hansson (eds.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis: Reasoning About Uncertainty. Berlin, New York, London: Springer.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “Interdisciplinary Success Without Integration“. Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3): 343ï¿½360.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “Seven Problems for Massive Simulation Models“. In M. M. Resch, A. Kaminski, & P. Gehring (Eds.), The Science and Art of Simulation. Berlin, New York: Springer.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “Why Behavioural Policy Needs Mechanistic Evidence. Economics and Philosophy, 32(3): 463-483.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R.: “Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?” Minds and Machines, 26(1): 149-83.

Raul Hakli & Pekka Mäkelä: “Robots, autonomy, and responsibility”. In Seibt, J., Nï¿½rskov, M., Schack Andersen, S. (eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do, Proceedings of Robophilosophy/TRANSOR 2016, IOS Press: Amsterdam, 2016, 145-154.

Raul Hakli, Kaarlo Miller & Raimo Tuomela: “Ryhmï¿½pï¿½ï¿½ttely” (“Group reasoning”, in Finnish). In Mikko Ylikangas (ed.): Mielen salat

Hands, D. Wade: “The Road to Rationalization: A History of ‘Where the Empirical Lives’ (or Has Lived) in Consumer Choice Theory“. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

Hands, D. Wade: “Crossing in the Night of the Cold War: Alternative Visions and Related Tensions in Western and Soviet General Equilibrium Theory“. History of Economic Ideas.

Hands, D. Wade: “Derivational Robustness, Credible Substitute Systems and Mathematical Economic Models: The Case of Stability Analysis in Walrasian General Equilibrium Theory“. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6, 31-53.

Hands, D. Wade: “The Individual and the Market: Paul Samuelson on (Homothetic) Santa Claus Economics“. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23, 425-452.

Hands, D. Wade: “Introduction to Symposium on ‘Patrick Suppes, Economics, and Economic Methodology’“. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23, 237-240.

Hands, D. Wade: “Review of: Paul Samuelson on the History of Economic Analysis“. In Steve Medema and Anthony Waterman (eds.), Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 38, 391-394.

Heinonen, Matti: “Minimalism and Maximalism in the Study of Shared Intentional Action”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (2): 168-188.

Hirvonen, Onni & Laitinen, Arto: “Recognition and Democracy ï¿½ An Introduction“, Thesis Eleven, 134 (1), 3-12.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Sosiologiset keskitason teoriat ja teorianmuodostuksen dynamiikka.” Sosiologia 53(1): 28-44.

Knuuttila, Tarja; Loettgers, Andreas: “Model templates within and between disciplines: from magnets to gases ï¿½ and socio-economic systems“. Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(3): 377-400.

Kokkonen, Tomi & Koskinen, Inkeri: “Genres as Real Kinds and Projections: Homeostatic Property Clusters in Folklore and Art”. In Frog and K. Koski (eds.), Genre ï¿½ Text ï¿½ Interpretation. Studia Fennica Folkloristica, Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.

Koskinen, Inkeri: “Where Is the Epistemic Community? On Democratisation of Science and Social Accounts of Objectivity”. Synthese, p. 1-16

Koskinen, Inkeri & Mäki, Uskali: “Extra-Academic Transdisciplinarity and Scientific Pluralism: What might they learn from one another?” Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6(3):419-444.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko and Marchionni, Caterina: “Evidential diversity and the triangulation of phenomena“. Philosophy of Science 83(2): 227-247.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko & Marchionni, Caterina: “Triangulation across the lab, the scanner and the field: the case of social preferences“. Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6(3): 361-376.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko and Ylikoski, Petri: “Self-interest, norms, and explanation” in Normativity and Naturalism in the Social Sciences, Mark Risjord (ed.) London: Routledge: 212-229.

Laitinen, Arto: “Hegelian Constructivism in Ethical Theory?” in I that is We, We that is I, Italo Testa & Luigi Ruggiu (eds). Brill.

Lehtinen, Aki: “Allocating confirmation with derivational robustness”, Philosophical Studies 173: 2487.

Kincaid, Harold: “Debating the Reality of Social Classes”. Philosophy of Social Science: pp 1-21.

Lepenies R., Malecka M.: “Nudges, Recht und Politik: Institutionelle Implikationen, Zeitschrift fï¿½r Praktische Philosophie“. Themenschwerpunkt: Libertï¿½rer Paternalismus. Entscheidungsarchitekturen in Theorie und Praxis, Band 3, Heft 1, (Juli), 487-530

MacLeod, Miles: “Heuristic approaches to models and modeling in systems biology“. Biology & Philosophy, 31(3), 353-372.

MacLeod, Miles: “How Language became a Tool: The Reconceptualisation of Language and the Empirical Turn in 17th Century Britain&qtuo;. In MacLeod, M., Sumillera, R., Surman, J. and Smirnova, E. (eds.), Language as a Scientific Tool. New York: Routledge.

MacLeod, Miles: “What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice“. Synthese (10.1007/s11229-016-1236-4)

MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J.: “Interdisciplinary problem-solving: emerging modes in integrative systems biology“. Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6(3): 401-418.

MacLeod, Miles and Nagatsu, Michiru: “Model coupling in resource economics: conditions for effective interdisciplinary collaboration”, Philosophy of Science, 83(3)

MacLeod, M., Sumillera, R. G., Surman, J., & Smirnova, E. (Eds.): “Language as a Scientific Tool: Shaping Scientific Language Across Time and National Traditions“. New York: Routledge.

Mï¿½ki, Uskali: “Philosophy of interdisciplinarity. What? Why? How?” Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6(3): 327-342. [Download PDF]

Mï¿½ki, Uskali & MacLeod, Miles: “Interdisciplinarity in action: philosophy of science perspectives“. Special issue on Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity, European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6(3): 323-326.

Martini, Carlo & Fernández Pinto, Manuela: “Modeling the Social Organization of Science: Chasing Complexity through Simulations”. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7(2), pp. 221-238.

Merz, Martina and Biniok, Peter: “The local articulation of contextual resources: From metallic glasses to nanoscale research” In: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 29.

Merz, Martina and Sormani, Philippe (eds.): The Local Configuration of New Research Fields: On Regional and National Diversity. (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 29.) Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “Can Bohmian quantum information help us to understand consciousness?” In H. Atmanspacher, T. Filk, & E. Pothos (Eds.), Quantum Interaction 2015: 9th International Conference, QI 2015, selected papers. Heidelberg: Springer.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “Consciousness in the light of quantum theory“. In P.S. Satsangi, & S. Hameroff (Eds.), Consciousness: Integrating Eastern and Western Perspectives (pp. 103-14). New Delhi: N.A. Books.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “A quantum cure for panphobia“. In W. Seager (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism. London: Routledge.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “Quantum theory, active information and the mind-matter problem“. In E. Zhafarov, S. Jordan, R. Zhang, & V. Cervantes (Eds.), Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology. Advanced series on mathematical psychology, Vol. 6 (pp. 325-334). Singapore: World Scientific.

Pylkkänen, Paavo, Hiley, Basil J. and Pättiniemi, Ilkka: “Bohm’s approach and individuality” In: Guay, A. & Pradeu, T. (eds.), Individuals Across Sciences: a Revisionary Metaphysics?, Oxford University Press.

Raerinne, Jani: “Explanations of Exceptions in Biology: Corrective Asymmetry vs. Autonomy.” (e-pub ahead of print) Synthese

Rolin, Kristina: “Values in the social sciences: The case of feminist research” In Meta-Philosophical Reflection on Feminist Philosophies of Science, Maria Cristina Amoretti and Nicla Vassallo (ed.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Vol. 317. Dordrecht: Springer, 133-150.

Rolin, Kristina: “Values, standpoints, and scientific/intellectual movements” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56: 11-19.

Rolin, Kristina. ” Collective epistemic responsibility: A reply to Chris Dragos.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (11): 7-11.

Rolin, Kristina. ” Tiede, arvot ja sukupuoli. [Science, values, and gender] “ In Sukupuoli ja filosofia [Gender and philosophy: A Colloquim of the Philosophical Society of Finland] , eds. Kristina Rolin, Olli-Pekka Moisio, Martina Reuter, and Miira Tuominen. Jyvï¿½ksylï¿½: SoPhi, 90-101.

Rusanen, Anna-Mari and Lappi, O: “On Computational Explanations”. Synthese 193(12) 3931ï¿½3949.

Salmela, Mikko and Nagatsu, Michiru: “Collective emotions and joint action: beyond received and minimalist approaches” Journal of Social Ontology 2(1), 33-57.

Tuomela, Raimo and Mäkelä, Pekka: “Group Agents and Their Responsibility” Journal of Ethics 20 (1), 299-316.

Walsh, Adrian; Hormio, Sï¿½de & Purves, Duncan(eds.): The Ethical Underpinnings of Climate Economics. Routledge.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Review of Are We All Scientific Experts Now? by Harry Collins” Science and Education 25: 461-464.

Zahle, Julie: “Methodological Holism in the Social Sciences“. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/, pp. 1-39.

Zahle, Julie: ï¿½Methodological Anti-Naturalism, Norms and Participant Observationï¿½ in Normativity and Naturalism in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Mark Risjord (ed.) London: Routledge.

2015

Barton, Adrien & Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till (eds.): Special Issue on Nudge. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6(3).

Barton, Adrien & Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “From libertarian paternalism to nudging – and beyond” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6(3): 341-359.

Basso, Alessandra & C. Marchionni, Caterina: “I modelli in economia” [Models in Economics]. In: Aphex, Portale Italiano di Filosofia Analitica, January 2015, vol. 11.

Damholdt, Malene F., Marco Nï¿½rskov, Ryuji Yamazaki, Raul Hakli, Catharina Vesterager Hansen, Christina Vestergaard, Johanna Seibt: “Attitudinal change in elderly citizens towards social robots: the role of personality traits and beliefs about robot functionality” Frontiers in Psychology 6:1701, 1ï¿½13.

Godman, M.”The Special Science Dilemma and How Culture Solves It” in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(3), 491-508.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “Models of Temporal Discounting 1937-2000: An Interdisciplinary Exchange Between Economics and Psychology” Science in Context 28(4), 675-713.

Grï¿½ne-Yanoff, Till: “Why behavioral policy needs mechanistic evidence” Economics and Philosophy.

Hakli, Raul: “Collective Belief”. In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: Third Edition, R. Audi (ed.), 178-179.

Hakli, Raul: “Inquiry and justification” In Perspectives on Interrogative Models of Inquiry: Developments in Inquiry and Questions, Can Baskent (ed.), Springer series on Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning 8, Springer, 1-13.

Hakli, Raul & Mï¿½kelï¿½, Pekka: “Social Ontology” In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: Third Edition, R. Audi (ed.) , 999-1000.

Hands, D. Wade: “Review of: Model Building in Economics: Its Purposes and Limitations, by Lawrence Boldand“. History of Political Economy, 47, 541-543.

Hands, D. Wade: “Orthodox and Heterodox Economics in Recent Economic Methodology“. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy of Economics, 8/1, 61-81.

Hari, Jï¿½rvinen, Lehtonen, Lonka, Perï¿½kylï¿½, Pyysiï¿½inen, Salenius, Sams & Ylikoski: Ihmisen mieli [Human Mind]. Gaudeamus. 205 pages.

Hedstrï¿½m, Peter & Ylikoski, Petri: “Analytical Sociology” In: James D. Wright (editor-in-chief) International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences 2nd Edition, Vol. 1. Oxford: Elsevier: 668-673.

Heinonen, Matti: “Review of “Joint Commitment: How we Make the Social World””, Journal of Social Ontology 1(1): 175-178.

Ikï¿½heimo, H., Laitinen, A., & Sï¿½rkelï¿½, A.: “Pathologies of Recognition. An Introduction.“. In Studies in Social and Political Thought 25 (pp. 3-24).

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Review of Poe Yu-ze Wan: Reframing the Social”, Journal of Critical Realism 4(14), 441-444.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Prï¿½cis of Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology”, Journal of Social Ontology 2(1), 321-326.

Kaidesoja, Tuukka: “Elaborating Naturalized Critical Realism: Response to Ruth Groff, Dave Elder-Vass, Daniel Little and Petri Ylikoski”, Journal of Social Ontology 2(1), 359-375.

Koskinen, Inkeri: Changing Research Communities: Essays on Objectivity and Relativism in Contemporary Cultural Research. Helsinki: Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki 47. Doctoral dissertation.

Koskinen, Inkeri: “Researchers Building Nations: Under What Conditions Can Overtly Political Research Be Objective?” In: U. Mï¿½ki, S. Ruphy, G. Schurz and I. Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Cham: Springer.

Koskinen, Inkeri: Villi Suomen historia: Välimeren Väinämöisestä Äijäkupittaan pyramideihin“. Helsinki: Tammi.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko and Marchionni, Caterina: “Models and Simulations in Science” Special Issue, Perspectives on Science 23:4.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko and Ylikoski, Petri: “External Representations and Scientific Understanding” Synthese 192(12), 3817ï¿½3837

Laitinen, Arto: “On Michael Thompson’s Life and Action: Practices as ‘Actual’ Sources of Goodness of Actions.” Philosophy and Public Issues (New series). Supplementary Volume (2015): 57-70.

Laitinen, Arto: “Social Pathologies, Reflexive Pathologies, and the Idea of Higher-order Disorders“. In A. Laitinen, & A. Sï¿½rkelï¿½ (Eds.), Studies in Social and Political Thought 25; special issue on Pathologies of Recognition (pp. 44-65).

Laitinen, Arto: “Broader Contexts of Non-Domination: Pettit and Hegel on Freedom and Recognition“. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18 (4), 390-406.

Laitinen, Arto and Eskelinen, Teppo: “Taxation: Its Justification and Application to Global Contexts” In: Philosophical Explorations of Justice and Taxation National and Global Issues, eds Gaisbauer, H P; Schweiger, G & Sedmak, C., Springer, book series “Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice” vol 40, 219-236.

Lehtinen, Aki: “Strategic voting and the degree of path-dependence” Group Decision and Negotiation 24(1), 97-114.
[Download PDF]

Lehtinen, Aki: “A welfarist critique of social choice theory : Interpersonal comparisons in voting theory”, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8(2), 34-83
[Download PDF]

Lepenies R.,Malecka M.: “The institutional consequences of nudging ï¿½ nudges, politics, and the law“. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6(3), Special Issue on Nudges: 427-437

Lisciandra, Chiara: “Robustness Analysis Versus Reliable Process Reasoning: Review of Robert Hudson: Seeing things: The philosophy of reliable observation”, Metascience 24(1) p. 37-41.

Mï¿½kelï¿½, Pekka: “Tuomela, Raimo” In The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy: Third Edition, R. Audi (ed.), 1085.

Mäki, U; Votsis, I; Ruphy S; Schurz, G (eds). Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA 13 Helsinki. Cham: Springer

Martini, Carlo: “The Paradox Of Proof And Scientific Expertise“. Humana.Mente – Journal of Philosophical Studies, 28.1, 1-16.

Merz, Martina and Sormani, Philippe: “Configuring new research fields: How policy, place, and organization are made to matter” (introductory chapter). In: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 29.

Nagatsu, Michiru: “Behavioral Economics, History of” In: International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier.

Nagatsu, Michiru: “Social nudges: their mechanisms and justification” in a special issue of Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6(3), 481-494.

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “Fundamental physics and the mind ï¿½ is there a connection?” In H. Atmanspacher, C. Bergomi, T. Filk, & K. Kitto (Eds.), Quantum Interaction 2014: 8th International Conference, QI 2014, selected papers (pp. 3-11). Heidelberg: Springer http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_1

Pylkkï¿½nen, Paavo: “The quantum epochï¿½“. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119 (3), 332-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.014

Pylkkänen, Paavo: “Weak vs. Strong Quantum Cognition” In: Liljenstrï¿½m, Hans (Ed.), Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (IV). Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics – 2013, Springer, 411-418.

Pï¿½yhï¿½nen, Samuli: “Memory as a cognitive kind. Brains, remembering dyads and exograms“. In C. Kendig (ed.), Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice. London: Pickering & Chatto, 145ï¿½156.

Rolin, Kristina “Economics imperialism and epistemic cosmopolitanism” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.

Rolin, Kristina: “Values in science: The case of scientific collaboration”. Philosophy of Science 82 (2): 157-177.

Walsh, Adrian: “Attitudes: Review of Neil Levy, Consciousness and Moral Responsibility”, The Australian Book Review, no. 376, p.50.

Walsh, Adrian: “Compensation for blood plasma donation as a distinctive ethical hazard: Reformulating the Commodification Objection”, HEC Forum 27(4), pp. 401-416.

Walsh, Adrian: “Review of Tom Clark and Ant hony Heath, Hard Times”, The Australian Book Review, no. 369, pp. 22-23.

Walsh, Adrian: “Sport, Commerce and the Market” In: M. McNamee and W.J. Morgan (eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport, Routledge, 411-425.

Ylikoski, Petri and Pöyhönen, Samuli: “The Addiction-as-a-kind hypothesis” International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research 4(1), 21-25.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology”, Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2): 333ï¿½340.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Hyviï¿½ ja huonoja perusteita kokeelliselle sosiologialle”, Sosiologia 3/2015, 204-221.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Mitï¿½ on sattuma?”, in Hetemï¿½ki, Raento, Sariola & Seppï¿½ (toim.): Kaikkea sattuu, Gaudeamus:13-25.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Social Mechanisms”, in James D. Wright (editor-in-chief): International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 22. Oxford: Elsevier: 415ï¿½420.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Review of The Limits of Social Science. Causal Explanation and Value Relevance by Martyn Hammersley”, Acta Sociologica 58: 283-284.

Ylikoski, Petri: “Review of Process-Tracing Methods. Foundations and Guidelines by Derek Beach and Rasmus Brun Pedersen”, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 44: 634-635.

Zahle, Julie: “Methodological Holism” in Wiley-Blackwellï¿½s Encyclopedia of Sociology, Second Edition, George Ritzer (ed.), Oxford, Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.

Zamora-Bonilla, J., Bouvier, A., Kaldis, B., Montuschi, E., & Zahle, J. (eds.): “Special Issue: Selected Papers from the ENPOSS Meeting, Madrid 10-12 September 2014,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences.